Grajales v. Commissioner (156 T.C. No. 3)
On January 25, 2021, the Tax Court issued its opinion in Grajales v. Commissioner, 156 T.C. No. 3. The underlying issue presented in Grajales was whether prior written supervisory approval under IRC § 6751(b)(1) was required to assert the 10% IRC § 72(t) “exaction” for early distributions from a qualified retirement plan. Labels are for Cans Abraham Lincoln is credited for saying “How many legs does a dog have if you call his tail a leg? Four. Saying that a tail is a leg doesn't make it a leg.” Similarly, calling a tax a penalty or a penalty a tax does not make it so. We have seen the IRS argue in previous cases argue that the IRC § 6751(b)(1) approval requirement does not apply certain penalties, because even though it’s called a “penalty” it is collected like a tax. Circle back to Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson and Chadwick to name…



