Income Tax Issues
Burden of Proof

Blum v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-18

On February 18, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Blum v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-18). The primary issue presented in Blum v. Commissioner was whether the petitioner was entitled to exclude from her gross income the $125,000 settlement payment (from a suit against former attorneys who bungled a personal injury lawsuit on petitioner’s behalf) as damages received “on account of personal physical injuries or physical sickness” under IRC §

Read More »
Scott St. Amand February 18, 2021
Penalties Under the Code
Burden of Proof

Kramer v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-16

On February 16, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Kramer v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-16). The primary issues presented in Kramer v. Commissioner were whether the petitioners were in default and whether the IRS carried its various burdens of production and proof with respect to the deficiencies asserted. Background to Kramer v. Commissioner The petitioners are not what you would call “cooperative” or “responsible” taxpayers. Although they brought petition

Read More »
Scott St. Amand February 16, 2021
Business Related Issues
Books and Records

Lucero v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-136

On September 29, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Lucero v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-136). The issue before the court in Lucero v. Commissioner was whether the petitioners’ real estate loss deductions were disallowed by IRC § 469 and/or IRC § 280A. Background to Lucero v. Commissioner The petitioner-husband owned a short-term rental property in The Sea Ranch, California. To be clear, the property was not in Sea Ranch,

Read More »
Scott St. Amand September 29, 2020
Income Tax Issues
Books and Records

Sham v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-119

On August 12, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Sham v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-119). The primary issues before the court in Sham v. Commissioner were whether the petitioner had (or could) substantiate significant itemized deductions, business deductions, and other “miscellaneous” deductions, and (2) whether the petitioner had failed to report (or maintain records of) her gross receipts. Introductory Note to Sham v. Commissioner My dad ran political campaigns

Read More »
Scott St. Amand August 12, 2020
Penalties Under the Code
Burden of Proof

Oropeza v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-111

On July 21, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Oropeza v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-111). The primary issue before the court in Oropeza v. Commissioner was whether IRS secured timely written supervisory approval, as required by IRC § 6751(b)(1), for three penalties determined in the notice of deficiency for petitioners’ 2012 tax year. The Initial Determination in Oropeza v. Commissioner In November 2015, the IRS sent petitioners a Letter

Read More »
Scott St. Amand July 21, 2020
Penalties Under the Code
Burden of Proof

Duffy v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-108

On July 13, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Duffy v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-108). The primary issue before the court in Duffy v. Commissioner was whether, because the petitioners’ debt to the bank was nonrecourse, the discharge of indebtedness was included in the petitioners amount realized on the sale of the property and did not give rise to cancellation of indebtedness income under Treas. Reg. § 1.1001-2(a). A

Read More »
Scott St. Amand July 13, 2020
Business Related Issues
Burden of Proof

Simpson v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-100

On July 7, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Simpson v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-100). The issue before the court in Simpson v. Commissioner was whether the petitioners were allowed deductions for unreimbursed partnership expenses (2012-2014) and unreimbursed employee business expenses (2014), which deductions were adjusted in the IRS’s amended answer. Background to Simpson v. Commissioner The IRS issued the petitioners a notice of deficiency for tax years 2012,

Read More »
Scott St. Amand July 7, 2020
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pocket
Email
Print

Most popular tagged posts:

Blum v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-18

On February 18, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Blum v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-18). The primary issue presented in Blum v. Commissioner was whether the petitioner was entitled to exclude from her gross income the $125,000 settlement payment (from a suit against former

Read More »
Scott St. Amand February 18, 2021

Kramer v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-16

On February 16, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Kramer v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-16). The primary issues presented in Kramer v. Commissioner were whether the petitioners were in default and whether the IRS carried its various burdens of production and proof with respect

Read More »
Scott St. Amand February 16, 2021

Lucero v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-136

On September 29, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Lucero v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-136). The issue before the court in Lucero v. Commissioner was whether the petitioners’ real estate loss deductions were disallowed by IRC § 469 and/or IRC § 280A. Background to

Read More »
Scott St. Amand September 29, 2020

Sham v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-119

On August 12, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Sham v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-119). The primary issues before the court in Sham v. Commissioner were whether the petitioner had (or could) substantiate significant itemized deductions, business deductions, and other “miscellaneous” deductions, and (2)

Read More »
Scott St. Amand August 12, 2020

Oropeza v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-111

On July 21, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Oropeza v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-111). The primary issue before the court in Oropeza v. Commissioner was whether IRS secured timely written supervisory approval, as required by IRC § 6751(b)(1), for three penalties determined in

Read More »
Scott St. Amand July 21, 2020

Duffy v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-108

On July 13, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Duffy v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-108). The primary issue before the court in Duffy v. Commissioner was whether, because the petitioners’ debt to the bank was nonrecourse, the discharge of indebtedness was included in the

Read More »
Scott St. Amand July 13, 2020

Simpson v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-100

On July 7, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Simpson v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-100). The issue before the court in Simpson v. Commissioner was whether the petitioners were allowed deductions for unreimbursed partnership expenses (2012-2014) and unreimbursed employee business expenses (2014), which deductions

Read More »
Scott St. Amand July 7, 2020