Leyh v. Commissioner
157 T.C. No. 7

On October 4, 2021, the Tax Court issued its opinion in Leyh v. Commissioner (157 T.C. No. 7). The primary issue presented in Leyh v. Commissioner was whether the petitioner was entitled to deduct, as alimony, an amount equal to the premiums paid to provide health insurance coverage for his then spouse Held:  Yes, sir. Background to Leyh v. Commissioner In 2012, the petitioner in Leyh v. Commissioner, Mr. Leyh, filed for divorce from his then wife, Ms. Leyh. The petitioner and Ms. Leyh filed and signed an agreement in 2014 incident to their divorce proceeding, in which agreement the petitioner agreed to pay Ms. Leyh alimony pendente lite until the final divorce decree was granted.[1] As part of the agreement, the petitioner further agreed to pay for Ms. Leyh's health and vision insurance. In 2015, the petitioner paid (as alimony) $10,683 for Ms. Leyh's health insurance premiums as pretax payroll reductions…

0 Comments

Parker v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-111

On September 23, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Parker v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-111). The primary issues presented in Parker v. Commissioner were (1) whether petitioners can deduct, on Schedule C (Profit or Loss From Business), car and truck expenses in excess of the amount the IRS allowed; (2) whether petitioners can deduct retirement contributions in excess of the amount the IRS allowed; (3) whether petitioners can deduct expenses on Schedule A (Itemized Deductions), in excess of the amount the IRS allowed; and (4) whether petitioners can deduct the cost of demolishing a structure and their basis in that structure. Background to Parker v. Commissioner In 2015, Mrs. Parker was a personal trainer enrolled in a Ph.D. program at Georgia State. As part of this program she conducted research by traveling in the Atlanta metro area to collect data and meet with study participants.…

0 Comments