Income Tax Issues
IRC § 162

Brashear v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-122

On August 19, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Brashear v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-122). The primary issue before the court in Brashear was whether the petitioners were entitled to various deductions on Schedule C (Profits and Loss from Business). Business-Related Deductions 101 in Brashear v. Commissioner The taxpayer’s burden of proof regarding entitlement to deductions requires the taxpayer to substantiate all expenses underlying the deductions claimed by keeping

Read More »
Scott St. Amand August 19, 2020
Business Related Issues
Burden of Proof

Sellers v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-84)

On June 15, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Sellers v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-84). The primary issue before the court in Sellers v. Commissioner was whether the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to substantiate his bases in certain companies and his material participation (for passive activity loss purposes). This case also presents a very interesting question of whether the burden of proof really shifts to the IRS to prove

Read More »
Scott St. Amand June 15, 2020
Income Tax Issues
Burden of Proof

Kroner v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-73

On June 1, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Kroner v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-73). The issues before the court in Kroner v. Commissioner were (1) whether transfers of funds to petitioner during the years at issue constitute gifts that petitioner properly excluded from gross income under IRC § 102 and (2) whether petitioner is liable for accuracy-related penalties under IRC § 6662. How Many Kroners does it Take

Read More »
Scott St. Amand June 1, 2020
Income Tax Issues
Burden of Proof

Hakkak v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-46

On April 13, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Hakkak v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-45). The issue properly before the court in Hakkak v. Commissioner was whether petitioners are entitled to treat as nonpassive certain rental real estate losses they previously treated as passive under IRC § 469 on their Schedules E (Supplemental Income and Loss) for the years at issue. The 2011 and 2012 Returns in Hakkak v.

Read More »
Scott St. Amand April 13, 2020
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pocket
Email
Print

Most popular tagged posts:

Brashear v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-122

On August 19, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Brashear v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-122). The primary issue before the court in Brashear was whether the petitioners were entitled to various deductions on Schedule C (Profits and Loss from Business). Business-Related Deductions 101 in

Read More »
Scott St. Amand August 19, 2020

Sellers v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-84)

On June 15, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Sellers v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-84). The primary issue before the court in Sellers v. Commissioner was whether the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to substantiate his bases in certain companies and his material participation (for

Read More »
Scott St. Amand June 15, 2020

Kroner v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-73

On June 1, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Kroner v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-73). The issues before the court in Kroner v. Commissioner were (1) whether transfers of funds to petitioner during the years at issue constitute gifts that petitioner properly excluded from

Read More »
Scott St. Amand June 1, 2020

Hakkak v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-46

On April 13, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Hakkak v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-45). The issue properly before the court in Hakkak v. Commissioner was whether petitioners are entitled to treat as nonpassive certain rental real estate losses they previously treated as passive

Read More »
Scott St. Amand April 13, 2020