Penalties Under the Code
Accuracy Related Penalty

Harriss v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-31

On March 11, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Harriss v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-31). The primary issues presented in Harriss v. Commissioner were whether the notices of deficiency issued to the petitioners were valid and whether the petitioner is liable under IRC § 72(t) for the early withdrawal penalty. Shenanigans in Harriss v. Commissioner The petitioner was paid, on average, $150,000 in 2012, 2013, and 2014.  Forms 1099

Read More »
Income Tax Issues
Frivolous

Lashua v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-151

On November 9, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case Lashua v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-151). The primary issues before the court in Lashua v. Commissioner were whether the petitioner had unreported retirement income, whether the petitioner was liable for additional tax under IRC § 72(t), and whether the petitioner received a valid notice of deficiency.  A further issue was whether the petitioner was completely full of shit.  Judge Marvel –

Read More »
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pocket
Email
Print

Most popular tagged posts:

Harriss v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-31

On March 11, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Harriss v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-31). The primary issues presented in Harriss v. Commissioner were whether the notices of deficiency issued to the petitioners were valid and whether the petitioner is liable under IRC §

Read More »

Lashua v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2020-151

On November 9, 2020, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case Lashua v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2020-151). The primary issues before the court in Lashua v. Commissioner were whether the petitioner had unreported retirement income, whether the petitioner was liable for additional tax under IRC § 72(t),

Read More »