Business Related Issues
Computer Software

BATS Global Markets Holdings Inc. v. Commissioner
158 T.C. No. 5

On March 31, 2022, the Tax Court issued the full opinion in BATS Global Markets Holdings Inc. v. Commissioner (158 T.C. No. 5). The primary issue presented in BATS Global Markets Holdings Inc. v. Commissioner was whether the petitioner’s transaction fees, routing fees, and logical port fees qualify as domestic production gross receipts (DPGR) for the purpose of calculating deductions pursuant to IRC § 199. Held: No dice, BATS. Procedural Background to BATS Global Markets

Read More »
Scott St. Amand June 13, 2022
Income Tax Issues
Books and Records

Safaryan v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-138

On December 13, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Safaryan v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-138). The primary issue presented in Safaryan was whether the petitioners were entitled to deduct certain Schedule C expenses for car and truck expenses, travel expenses, and “other” expenses. Held: Not so much. Background to Safaryan v. Commissioner In 2012 or 2013 the petitioner-husband purchased 10 acres of property in Newberry Springs, California. The property

Read More »
Scott St. Amand April 24, 2022
Penalties Under the Code
Accuracy Related Penalty

Soni v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-137

On December 1, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Soni v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-137). The primary issues presented in Soni were (1) whether the petitioners filed a valid joint return; (2) whether the period of limitations for assessment of tax under IRC § 6501(a) and (c)(4) expired before the issuance of the notice of deficiency; (3) whether the petitioners are liable for an addition to tax under IRC

Read More »
Scott St. Amand April 23, 2022
Procedural Issues
Higbee v. Commissioner

On Penalties and Burdens

A burden is a burden, right?  A thirty-three-year-old man-child, living in his mother’s basement, with a Cheeto-stained, self-described “ironical” mustache, then yes.  That’s a burden, no matter how you slice it.  No need to prove it or to produce evidence to support it.  He’s a bum and a burden.  Shave the flavor saver, and get a damn job, hippie. Proof and production, though.  Six of one, half a dozen of another?  Not when it comes

Read More »
Scott St. Amand August 30, 2021
Income Tax Issues
Employee

Blossom Day Care Centers Inc. v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-86

On July 13, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Blossom Day Care Centers Inc. v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-86). The issues presented in Blossom Day Care Centers Inc. v. Commissioner were whether: (1) the day care’s corporate officers should be legally classified as employees of petitioner such that petitioner is liable for employment tax (FICA) and unemployment tax (FUTA); (2) petitioner was liable for FICA and FUTA taxes; (3) petitioner

Read More »
Scott St. Amand July 28, 2021
Business Related Issues
Accuracy Related Penalty

Plentywood Drug Inc. v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-45

On April 26, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Plentywood Drug Inc. v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-45). The primary issues presented in Plentywood Drug, Inc. were whether the petitioner’s owners received “fair rent” or constructive dividends for the rental of the petitioner’s drug store, and whether the petitioner (a corporation) satisfied its burden to show that the IRS failed to receive prior supervisory approval for the accuracy-related penalties at

Read More »
Scott St. Amand April 26, 2021
Penalties Under the Code
Accuracy Related Penalty

Walton v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-40

On March 30, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Walton v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-40). The primary issue presented in Walton was whether the petitioner qualified for the reasonable cause exception to the imposition of an accuracy-related penalty. Background to Walton v. Commissioner The petitioner was a New Yorker,[1] who failed to report $170,000 in nonemployee compensation in 2015. Strike one and two. The petitioner was terminated from her

Read More »
Scott St. Amand March 30, 2021
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pocket
Email
Print

Most popular tagged posts:

BATS Global Markets Holdings Inc. v. Commissioner
158 T.C. No. 5

On March 31, 2022, the Tax Court issued the full opinion in BATS Global Markets Holdings Inc. v. Commissioner (158 T.C. No. 5). The primary issue presented in BATS Global Markets Holdings Inc. v. Commissioner was whether the petitioner’s transaction fees, routing fees, and logical port fees qualify as domestic

Read More »
Scott St. Amand June 13, 2022

Safaryan v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-138

On December 13, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Safaryan v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-138). The primary issue presented in Safaryan was whether the petitioners were entitled to deduct certain Schedule C expenses for car and truck expenses, travel expenses, and “other” expenses. Held:

Read More »
Scott St. Amand April 24, 2022

Soni v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-137

On December 1, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Soni v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-137). The primary issues presented in Soni were (1) whether the petitioners filed a valid joint return; (2) whether the period of limitations for assessment of tax under IRC §

Read More »
Scott St. Amand April 23, 2022

On Penalties and Burdens

A burden is a burden, right?  A thirty-three-year-old man-child, living in his mother’s basement, with a Cheeto-stained, self-described “ironical” mustache, then yes.  That’s a burden, no matter how you slice it.  No need to prove it or to produce evidence to support it.  He’s a bum and a burden.  Shave

Read More »
Scott St. Amand August 30, 2021

Blossom Day Care Centers Inc. v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-86

On July 13, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Blossom Day Care Centers Inc. v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-86). The issues presented in Blossom Day Care Centers Inc. v. Commissioner were whether: (1) the day care’s corporate officers should be legally classified as employees of

Read More »
Scott St. Amand July 28, 2021

Plentywood Drug Inc. v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-45

On April 26, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Plentywood Drug Inc. v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-45). The primary issues presented in Plentywood Drug, Inc. were whether the petitioner’s owners received “fair rent” or constructive dividends for the rental of the petitioner’s drug store,

Read More »
Scott St. Amand April 26, 2021

Walton v. Commissioner
T.C. Memo. 2021-40

On March 30, 2021, the Tax Court issued a Memorandum Opinion in the case of Walton v. Commissioner (T.C. Memo. 2021-40). The primary issue presented in Walton was whether the petitioner qualified for the reasonable cause exception to the imposition of an accuracy-related penalty. Background to Walton v. Commissioner The

Read More »
Scott St. Amand March 30, 2021