Taxing, Briefly
30-Day Letter

The IRS Examination Process – Taxing, Briefly

Like Ten Thousand Spoons When All You Need is a Knife Do you feel like you are cursed to forever draw the short straw in life? Is Alanis Morrisette’s Ironic more of a personal anthem than an indictment of the Canadian educational system’s failure to properly differentiate between irony and unfortunate occurrences?  What does this have to do with the IRS examination process?  All in good time… In this post, we will assume that, in addition

Read More »
Scott St. Amand May 25, 2021
Procedural Issues
30-Day Letter

Procedural Considerations on Collection (Liens) – Part One: Authority and Limits on Assessment Imposition of Tax Lien

The flip side to the assessment coin is the IRS’s process of collection.  Collection procedures are really where the rubber meets the road for the IRS, which is charged with collecting the taxes imposed by the Code.[1] The IRS has two basic mechanisms for collecting an unpaid tax liability.  The first, which this article goes into in some detail, is the federal tax lien.  If the tax lien does not get the taxpayer’s attention, and

Read More »
Scott St. Amand April 29, 2021
Penalties Under the Code
30-Day Letter

Thompson v. Commissioner
155 T.C. No. 5

On August 27, 2020, the Tax Court issued its opinion in Thompson v. Commissioner (155 T.C. No. 5). The primary issue presented in Thompson v. Commissioner was whether the offer of settlement of the petitioners’ tax liabilities under reduced penalty rates on any later-determined underpayment arising out of an abusive tax transaction was an “initial determination” of a penalty for purposes of IRC § 6751(b)(1)’s prior written supervisory approval requirement. Background to Thompson v. Commissioner The

Read More »
Scott St. Amand August 27, 2020
Penalties Under the Code
"Penalty" Means "Penalty"

Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson Sales Inc. v. Commissioner
154 T.C. No. 4

On January 16, 2020, the Tax Court issued its opinion in Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson Sales Inc. v. Commissioner (154 T.C. No. 4). The issue presented in Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson Sales Inc. v. Commissioner was whether the written supervisory approval requirement of IRC § 6751(b)(1) applied to the assessable penalty imposed by IRC § 6707A (failure to disclose a reportable transaction). 30-Day Letter Triggered IRC § 6751(b)(1) Supervisory Approval Requirement in Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson Sales Inc. v. Commissioner The

Read More »
Scott St. Amand January 16, 2020
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pocket
Email
Print

Most popular tagged posts:

The IRS Examination Process – Taxing, Briefly

Like Ten Thousand Spoons When All You Need is a Knife Do you feel like you are cursed to forever draw the short straw in life? Is Alanis Morrisette’s Ironic more of a personal anthem than an indictment of the Canadian educational system’s failure to properly differentiate between irony and

Read More »
Scott St. Amand May 25, 2021

Thompson v. Commissioner
155 T.C. No. 5

On August 27, 2020, the Tax Court issued its opinion in Thompson v. Commissioner (155 T.C. No. 5). The primary issue presented in Thompson v. Commissioner was whether the offer of settlement of the petitioners’ tax liabilities under reduced penalty rates on any later-determined underpayment arising out of an abusive tax

Read More »
Scott St. Amand August 27, 2020

Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson Sales Inc. v. Commissioner
154 T.C. No. 4

On January 16, 2020, the Tax Court issued its opinion in Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson Sales Inc. v. Commissioner (154 T.C. No. 4). The issue presented in Laidlaw’s Harley Davidson Sales Inc. v. Commissioner was whether the written supervisory approval requirement of IRC § 6751(b)(1) applied to the assessable penalty imposed by

Read More »
Scott St. Amand January 16, 2020